The Era of the Moustache
Get out the razors and trim those liberal beards, lads.
I’m a fan of the movie, Tombstone. It is one of the very last movies that portrays masculinity in a positive light. The performances are all top notch, but the performance that I rate the highest in the film is that of Kurt Russell’s moustache.
Sam Elliot of course has an outstanding moustache in the movie, while Bill Paxton isn’t that bad, and Val Kilmer is excused as he was playing a man dying of tuberculosis. Billy Zane’s stache was pretty good too.
I rewatched the move the other day and the moustaches got me thinking. I remembered a long time ago when an old rafting buddy came back after a short season rafting in far Eastern Turkey. He was sporting an impressive moustache that had not existed when he had left for his adventure on the Coruh River. He told us that men without moustaches are not trusted by the locals, nor even thought of as men. Boys have smooth faces and men have moustaches. Apparently, a beard didn’t cut it. It had to be a moustache so he quickly grew a moustache.
Here is Frank Wright of Substack fame in an off the cuff street interview that recently went viral. Yes, Frank says a bunch of good things that we all here pretty much take for granted. But note the moustache. It’s not just me that is thinking like this.
The beard has long been co-opted by basement dwelling Marxist losers and liberals aping the dress code of Canadian lumberjacks. They typically have scraggly neck beards that are an apology for masculinity rather than an extension of it. Indians and Arabs typically also sport beards of varying degrees of success or failure, but these people are our historical, cultural and civilizational enemies, so why would we want to look like them? And don’t get me started on Hasidic Jews.
The moustache was a cultural heavyweight of the Australian sporting era in the 70s, particularly among the cricketers, with players such as Rodney Marsh and Dennis Lillie taking the art of the stache to new heights. But since it was also the domain of hairy porn stars of the era, it soon fell out of favour.
But did it fall out of favour due to the emerging war on masculinity? Once again, notice the level of moustache epicness in Tombstone, one of the last great masculine movies that not only made no apologies for masculine men but openly celebrated them.
As our internal cultural wars start to heat up, it behooves us to be able to recognise our allies on the street, while walking without fear or shame. We need to celebrate our masculinity while simultaneously promoting our racial, political and cultural beliefs. They can ban criticism of this or that ethnic group, they can ban the display of this or that symbol, but can they ban the stache?
I don’t think so.
I have sported a beard since my days living in Saudi Arabia but I feel like that time has now come to an end. So I am going to join Frank Wright in his days of the stache. But if I can get even close to the pure masculine epicness of Kurt Russell’s full frontal facial assault then I feel that my poor life will not have been in vain.

Adam - this tweet by Sam Hyde is dividing ‘right-wing’ social media. Personally I disagree with Hyde’s viewpoint which seems a bit ‘liberal’ and contrary to the Bible.:
https://nitter.net/wigger/status/2060125039245082941#m
Mr Piggott - you might be interested in a piece of advice that birth-control activist and 'sex educator' Margaret Sanger accepted from her English associate Bessie Drysdale:
''Also after the war, Drysdale personally campaigned about family planning on a motor car tour,[21] and arranged meetings across Britain held by the American birth control campaigner Margaret Sanger.[8][22] Bessie gave Margaret advice about how to dress, telling her that the more radical a persons ideas the more conservatively they should dress.''
This might explain why 'scruffy' politicians like Jeremy Corbyn and Bernie Sanders weren't as successful as Sir Tony Blair and Barack Obama, figures known for their cultivated and well-groomed image.
Herbert Spencer wrote about the link between facial hair and political outlook as far back as 1854!
''Whoever has studied the physiognomy of political meetings, cannot fail to have remarked a connection between democratic opinions and peculiarities of costume. At a Chartist demonstration, a lecture on Socialism, or a soirée of the Friends of Italy, there will be seen many among the audience, and a still larger ratio among the speakers, who get themselves up in a style more or less unusual, One gentleman on the platform divides his hair down the centre, instead of on one side; another brushes it back off the forehead in the fashion known as "bringing out the intellect;" a third has so long forsworn the scissors, that his locks sweep his shoulders. A considerable sprinkling of moustaches may be observed; here and there an imperial; and occasionally some courageous breaker of conventions exhibits a full-grown beard. [This was written before moustaches and beards had become common -- Spencer's note] This nonconformity in hair is countenanced by various nonconformities in dress, shown by others of the assemblage. Bare necks, shirt-collars à la Byron, waistcoats cut Quaker fashion, wonderfully shaggy great coats, numerous oddities in form and colour destroy the monotony usual in crowds. Even those exhibiting no conspicuous peculiarity, frequently indicate by something in the pattern or makeup of their clothes, that they pay small regard to what their tailors tell them about the prevailing taste. And when the gathering breaks up, the varieties of head-gear displayed-the number of caps, and the abundance of felt hats-suffice to prove that were the world at large like-minded, the black cylinders which tyrannise over us would soon be deposed.
The foreign correspondence of our daily press shows that this relationship between political discontent and the disregard Of customs exists on the Continent also. Red republicanism has always been distinguished by its hirsuteness. . . . If it be a fact that men of revolutionary aims in politics or religion, are commonly revolutionists in costume also, it is not less a fact that those whose office it is to uphold established arrangements in State and Church, are also those who most adhere to the social forms and practices bequeathed to us by past generations. . . . The University dress of the present year varies but little from that worn soon after the Reformation. The claret-coloured coat, knee-beeches, lace shirt-frills, ruffles, white silk stockings and buckled shoes, which once formed the usual dress of a gentleman, still survive as court-dress. And it need scarcely to be said that at levées and drawing-rooms, the ceremonies are prescribed with an exactness, and enforced with a rigour, not elsewhere to be found. [198-200]'' - 'On Manners and Fashion' (1854) - Herbert Spencer
https://victorianweb.org/philosophy/spencer/spencer2.html