The Role of the Church is to Save Souls

Munus Ecclesiae est Animas Servare

Chris Jackson does a sterling job collating the monstrous indiscretions of the current inhabitants of the public entity known as the Catholic Church. At times his documenting can become a tad wearying, which is most certainly not a reflection on the good Mr Jackson, but rather a further damning of the modern church. In his latest piece where the list of crimes and embarrassments include the evasion of scandal, the profiting off human misery, the erosion of Catholic dogma, and the use of legalism to protect wrongdoers, Jackson had the following to say.

This is a church that believes in process more than in truth, in narrative more than in justice, in funding streams more than in the fear of God. It is very good at mouthing the right spiritual phrases about “accompaniment,” “discernment,” and “transparency.” It is very bad at doing the one thing Christ actually commanded: let your yes be yes, your no be no, and stop lying.

In other words, this is the Catholic Church in name only.

I read an essay this week by Gene Thomas Gomulka, on the subject of the infestation of homosexuals in the Church. Both the United States Catholic clergy and the Vatican appear to have been effectively taken over by homosexuals. I do not doubt this, in fact I have written about it several times in the last decade. But I was very unhappy to see the following quote in the essay towards the end, and keep in mind that the end of an essay is the part which as a writer you utilise to make the key points that you want your audience to take away from the piece.

By forbidding priests to marry, the Church has become sociologically homosexual; and that by imposing a continence that is against nature, and a secretive culture, it is partly responsible for countless instances of sexual abuse that are undermining it from within.

Why is this bad? Because the enemies of the Church seek to destroy it both from without and within. So, create a massive problem by infiltrating homosexuals into the seminaries, then protect those same men when they sexually abuse men and boys, then when the rots gets big enough simply utilise the artificially created problem as an excuse to push for change of a core dogma of the Church, in this case celibacy of its priests.

I restacked this nonsense and called it out for what it is, which resulted in Mr Gomulka scurrying over and demanding that I attribute the quote to Frédéric Martel, the writer who originally wrote it. I refused, obviously, as I did not attribute the quote to Mr Gomulka in the first place, and the placement of the quote in a key position in his essay undoubtedly means that he himself supports it. In fact, he claims that the faggot problem has always been in the Church since its inception, even though he himself writes that when he went to seminary in the 1960s that there were very few homosexuals.

True, over the course of its history the Church has seen various popes and other clergy fall into the deadly sin of sodomy. But what we see today in the Church is on a far different level than the occasional boy loving pope in the past. Today it is systemic. One of the four sins that cries out to heaven for vengeance has become a core feature of the Church.

The communist agitator Bella Dodd admitted to planting 1,000 communists in US seminaries in the 30s and 40s, and if Alice von Hildebrand and Bp. Fulton Sheen are not good enough witnesses for her confession then I don’t know what to tell you. At the same time the Freemasons were actively infiltrating the Church, and had been for over 150 years. Then we got the massively heretical Vatican II which happened in the 1960s, the high water mark for the communist scare, but Vatican II never refers to communism, even though the Church had actively fought it since the time of Karl Marx. If communists can be purposely placed in seminaries then so too can homosexuals.

Today, sixty years later, the visible church is predominantly homosexual and consumed with the causes of the far left. It would not be too much of a jump to identify many actions of the Church and of its clergy as being communist in nature. The errors of Russia as foretold by our Lady at Fatima have been inflicted on the Church by the scourge of modernism, which is simply communism in another name.

Chris Jackson ends his essay with the following exhortation:

Whatever this system is, it is not simply a wounded version of what went before. It is something else, something that has learned how to use sacred words as cover for very worldly games.

Once you see that, the task becomes painfully clear.

Not to defend the paradigm shift. Not to help this machine “regain credibility.”

But to cling to the faith handed down before any of these people were born, to refuse to let it be rewritten in the name of pastoral strategy or federal cash, and to wait, pray, and work for the day when the church will once again fear God more than auditors, judges, or the next carefully crafted press release.

This is not God’s church. God’s Church is about saving souls. Anything else is superfluous at best, and diabolical at worst.

God provided us with free will, but implicit in that gift is responsibility for all of our actions. We are on earth in order to freely choose God, and in by doing so participate in His divine will. If we choose to be blind to that which is staring us in the face then we are hopeless. But the more of us that wake up and act, then the more erodes the power of those that wear our blessed Church like a skin suit. And perhaps in so doing there is a chance that their blighted souls might be saved.