The Steep Homo Slope
Asking if faggots should be allowed to have kids is the wrong question.
The position of the Right is simply the position of the Left thirty years ago. That’s why the Left have been so successful. They continue to push, and the Right continues to give way, and here we are. For the record, I am neither a fan of the Left or the Right. If I had my way we would have a full return to a Catholic monarchy, and kicking off with a good old fashioned Inquisition.
Anyhoo, here is an example of what I am talking about.
So the argument here is whether gay couples should be allowed to have children. But that is a misdirection. By arguing for this position, whether to be for the idea or against the idea, is to surrender to the Left on the very idea of acceptance of homosexuals.
The real question is not whether they should be allowed to have children, but rather, should they be allowed in our communities? Are they a net benefit to our societies? Does having fags in our communities make life better and safer for everyone else?
I will leave that question hanging there. In a Catholic monarchy, the very best form of government ever tried, homosexuals would be executed. This is because sodomy is one of the four most grievous mortal sins that causes Heaven to cry out for vengeance. The death penalty has always been supported by the Church, (not the fake sodomite church parading around today). That is because there are mortal sins for which the death penalty is a mercy. It is merciful to the victims of such sins, and it is merciful to the condemned as they are giving the opportunity to repent and say confession. It is also merciful as an example to others so that they might not be drawn into such sins themselves.
Apart from their sexual deviant acts, the most ardent desire of homosexuals is to increase their numbers, and our societies now support them to do this. Homosexuality as an acceptable lifestyle is now taught in schools to young children. Objecting to this is classified as a hate crime, and can attract police to your door in certain countries.
The real hate crime is the active encouragement to commit mortal sin as this destroys souls, and the effects ripple through society. Please tell me again how homosexuals are beneficial to our communities?
We are now a culture largely without standards. The only remaining standard is that you shall not object to the moral degeneracy that is pushed wholescale. The standard is that you are not allowed to have standards.
If it keeps going like this, in thirty years time the argument will be whether or not children at school should be allowed to film gay porn. Or perhaps that will be in five years. If anything the last decade has shown us that the slope sure is steep and slippery.
As I stated in a comment in one of your older posts, a large portion of people who describe themselves as ‘right-wing’ are basically 1990s liberals who don’t like the excesses of their ideology and bizzarely think the 90s were some sort of halcyon time, ignoring the social damage that was already inflicted and developing during that decade. I’ve been in heated discussions with people who mingle within the ‘Dissident Right’ sphere who react badly when I forward the view that the 1990s weren’t a great decade. Even when I point out the high levels of divorce, the debasing standards in media, ‘rave culture’, NAFTA, European Union expansion and the poor standards in education, I am accused of being ‘jealous’ that I missed out on the ‘last decade of sanity’.
Unfortunately, the belief that ‘Zoomers are more right-wing’ than previous generations is nonsense. The vast majority of young people (especially males) subject themselves to violent video games (conservatives used to oppose such material; liberals opposed censorship claiming those who endorsed prohibition were ‘Puritans’), watch pornography, support marijuana legalisation and — with a few exceptions — would oppose repealing any ‘liberal’ policies that were implemented before they were born or took place during their formative years. These people are just nostalgic for their youth, refusing to evaluate the decade without emotional bias.
This relates strongly to my earlier point that most people who are considered ‘right-wing’ are basically 90s liberals who don’t like how ‘authoritarian’ ‘progressive politics’ has become. If the trejactory doesn’t improve, your ‘right-wing’ person in the 2050s would be a ‘2020s liberal’, insisting that Joe Biden was actually a ‘moderate, maybe a conservative’, similar to how Bill Clinton is praised today for ‘opposing illegal immigration’ during the 1990s and how John F Kennedy ‘wouldn’t recognise the modern, woke Democratic Party’.
I should also add that a ‘Catholic monarchy’ is right-wing. ‘Free trade’ and unregulated capitalism is historically associated with liberalism, not conservative or right-wing politics. This is why a majority of Tories supported the protectionist Corn Laws policy, whilst their liberal opponents the Whigs supported repeal.
This is a good chapter on how a proper ‘conservative’ society views economic policy: https://www.anthonymludovici.com/da_04.htm
In Canada the CONservatives voted in lock step with the illiberals on Bill C-4 which bans so called conversion therapy. It became Federal Law in 2022 and the penalty is up to 5 years in prison.
They now hang pride flags in elementary schools and have "rainbow clubs". These are kids aged 5-11. The only thing they need to know about sexual orientation is "girls have cooties". Let kids be kids! These degenerates cannot help but degrade and corrupt everything they touch.